The Friday Imam, which is not scientifically as much as it could be jurisprudential, with his unstable comment, if his opinion was effective in the decision of the Assembly, on the day the dollar was bought and sold for $ 118, the price would be $ 7,000. Of course, if it is at his will, […]
![]()
The Friday Imam, which is not scientifically as much as it could be jurisprudential, with his unstable comment, if his opinion was effective in the decision of the Assembly, on the day the dollar was bought and sold for $ 118, the price would be $ 7,000. Of course, if it is at his will, CFT is forbidden, and the Expediency Council’s approval of the Expediency Council is not religiously.
Who is the guarantee of the huge losses that have been to Iran and the people of this country over the past 7 years, like many other questions, is permanently unanswered. The fate of the FTF, which has been a 24 -year -old, is similar to CFT, and it is unclear who is responsible for the losses that have inflicted this delay in the country and the nation.
Of course, the Expediency Council is unlikely to be influenced by the Friday Imam, which forbidden CIA. Most likely the members of the assembly themselves did not have a positive opinion, which has caused it to be confirmed in the past 7 years. In this case, all the responsibility for its delay and its negative effects on the country, the nation and the system is to the Expediency Council. In this case, the question is, why did the members of the Assembly find what they consider today to be useful for the country for the past 7 years?
Of course, a number of members of the Assembly have always stated that they considered joining these bills to the country and opposed it, but because the majority did not have such an opinion, these bills remained uncertain for many years, and they had a lot of damage to the country and the nation.
Thus, the main audience in this issue is the Expediency Council, which must answer several questions.
The first question is that opponents of the country joining the FATF and CFT over the past years that they have been uncertain did they know or did not know it in vain? If they did not know, they should admit that they were not in the Expediency Council and should not be in a position where they do not have the necessary conditions. And if they knew and opposed it at the same time, they would not have the necessary conditions.
Another question is how does the Expediency Council want to offset the huge losses of this delay? More importantly, are such major losses to the country, the people and the system compensated at the national scale? And more importantly, whether there is a law to account for the members of the Expediency Council in cases where they make a gross error. We know that some say there is no such law, while no one should be exempt from accountability under the constitution, and according to Article 107, all individuals in the country are the same against the law. This means that no one is excluded from the law and that everyone must accept responsibility for their actions.
The conclusion of these facts is that the Expediency Council needs a fundamental review. Members of this assembly must be at the highest level of scientific, cognition, public information, worldview, intellectual independence, commitment, democracy, democracy and intelligence. Only people with these characteristics can identify the real expediency of the country and the system and provide national interests.
(tagstotranslate) Expediency Council (T) Palermo and CFT
منبع













































