Ahmad Zaidabadi wrote on his telegram channel: The “Reform Front” request to suspend uranium enrichment volunteers in order to overcome the current crisis in the country’s foreign relations has been met with a cruel and threatening reaction by some of the “Antitatal Front” forces. The type of reactions itself reveals their speech logic! Instead of […]
Ahmad Zaidabadi wrote on his telegram channel:
The “Reform Front” request to suspend uranium enrichment volunteers in order to overcome the current crisis in the country’s foreign relations has been met with a cruel and threatening reaction by some of the “Antitatal Front” forces.
The type of reactions itself reveals their speech logic! Instead of resorting to the slander and threats that have become their political behavior, they must first answer the question of whether enrichment is in the service of the country or the country in the service of enrichment? In other words, is the enrichment of them to be sacrificed to the country in any situation and with any analysis?
Christ says, “Sabbath is for man, not a human being for Sabbath.” According to this principle, some have now said: “Ghannation is for the country, not the country for enrichment.” What do the reformists say?
In fact, the clear and honest answer to the question is that it closes or opens a logical discussion!
(tagstotranslate) uranium enrichment
منبع
